top of page


The Benefits of Acoustic Treatment in Schools

The Benefits of Acoustic Treatment in Schools

Despite the prevalence of environmental noise pollution in schools and the profound, wide-ranging, and long-term harms chronic exposure can inflict on children and adults alike, there is hope. The evidence suggests that acoustic treatment can be highly effective in preventing excessive environmental noise and its associated physical, academic, and psychosocial harms. Studies have shown that classroom refurbishments, which include environmental sound mitigation, have contributed to significant improvements in students’ listening and attentional capacities, in teachers’ voice ergonomics, and in the overall sense of physical and mental well-being in both students and teachers (1, 2).

It is for this reason that classroom acoustics are becoming a key priority in the design and construction of new schools and the renovation and refurbishment of existing ones. In response to the growing demand for sound mitigation, agencies, such as the EPA, and environmental accrediting bodies, including LEED certification programs through the US Green Building Council, have established standards for ensuring healthy and safe sound environments for children and educators in school environments.

For instance, the EPA has recommended ideal sound levels of 45 decibels or less on average for eight hours per every 24 hours in schools, hospitals, and private residences. Initiatives such as the Well Building Certification program and the Armstrong Living Building Challenge have also emerged to promote optimal learning environments through design and materials innovation, including supporting novel approaches to sound mitigation and acoustics optimization. Likewise, an array of state and local initiatives are emerging nationwide to support students’ and teachers’ health and performance on campus, including California’s Green Building Code, which has mandated acoustic treatment in all California public schools since 2011.

The Benefits of Acoustic Treatment in Schools

Although standards have been created, and there are ongoing initiatives to improve learning environments, noise pollution is inherently part of most schoolhouse environments. We know noise pollution in the classroom inhibits academic performance while impairing the physical, emotional, and mental health of children and teachers alike (3, 4, 28, 29). With all of the remote learning over the last three years, our children and teens are more sensitive than ever to large group interactions with loud sounds. So what will it take to get effective acoustic treatment in school environments to remediate the diverse harms associated with ambient noise pollution?

Re-envision the Classroom

We understand how constrained designers are by budget and how value engineering often cuts things like acoustic treatments. However, optimal learning environments don’t happen accidentally. They must be created intentionally, and maintaining healthy noise levels requires sound mitigation and acoustics optimization. Below we are going to explore the many reasons acoustics need to be elevated as a priority for healthy nervous system development of the kids attending schools and those teaching them.

When you are asked to envision the stereotypically noisy working environment, the first sites that probably spring to mind are industrial factories stuffed with heavy machinery or crowded airports with screaming jet engines perpetually overhead. Studies show, however, that when it comes to environmental noise pollution, nursery, primary, and secondary school classrooms rank near the top (2, 3, 5, 6). When a classroom is full of children playing or talking, levels can even reach up to 95 dBA, far beyond the recommended 45 dBA average and higher than the 90 dBA recommended maximum. This means that day in and day out, children and educators alike are being asked to perform in less than ideal conditions, to pursue developmental, cognitive, and academic milestones that may well establish the child’s entire life trajectory, in environments that are likely to not only inhibit their success but also to incite tangible harms.

The Physical Effects of Classroom Noise Exposure

If you’ve ever spent an extended amount of time in a noisy environment, you’re probably already quite familiar with the physical toll this can take. Environmental noise exposure has been associated with a host of negative physical impacts, including stress-induced spikes in blood pressure, respiration, heart rate, and muscle tension (7, 8, 9, 10). Long-term exposure to environmental noise has also been shown to increase the risk of tinnitus and hearing loss in both children and adults (11, 12, 13).

Psychosocial Harms

Unfortunately, the risks to children and teachers from long-term exposure to environmental noise extend far beyond the physical. There is mounting evidence that chronic noise exposure can have a devastating impact on mental health, increasing the risk of depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders in affected persons (14, 15, 16). For children, the research suggests, these harms can linger well into adulthood due to the functional and structural changes wrought by chronic noise exposure on the child’s developing brain (15, 16).

But environmental noise doesn’t just affect children’s sense of happiness, peace, and well-being. It has also been shown to undermine their capacity for forming healthy relationships with adults and peers and may even contribute to the development of behavioral and cognitive disorders, including ADHD, emotional hyperreactivity, and poor impulse control (17, 18, 19, 20).

Given the significant harm that prolonged noise exposure can have on children’s mood, behavior, and attention, it is perhaps no surprise that it should also be associated with steep declines in academic performance (4, 21, 22, 23). The research also indicates that these detrimental impacts are particularly acute for children with special needs and for second language learners (24).

Perhaps no population is more vulnerable to the adverse effects of classroom noise, however, than students who are on the autism spectrum or who have sensory processing disorders (25, 26, 27). For these children, hypersensitivity to environmental stimuli means that environmental noise can quickly transform the classroom from a place of learning, support, and caring into a place of confusion, chaos, and even terror.

An Acoustic Champion

The long-term impacts of noise are subtle and difficult to understand since they are not direct or easy to trace. The good news is that science is elevating the importance of acoustic treatments and prioritizing sound absorptive materials. School projects also need an acoustic design champion, someone who understands the critical nature of a good acoustic design and presents the case studies to ensure it doesn't get cut from the project.

How FSorb Can Help

At FSorb, we offer a wide range of state-of-the-art, environmentally friendly acoustic solutions for use in residential, commercial, government facilities, and public and private schools. Our products include customizable wall and ceiling panels for exterior and interior sound mitigation to meet and exceed rigorous EPA, LEED, WELL, and State of California standards.

Since our products are fully customizable, we are uniquely prepared to meet both your functional and your aesthetic needs. With FSorb, you have the freedom to choose from a wide array of colors, styles, and patterns to achieve the look you need. Whether you’re in the market for sleek elegance ideal for secondary and post-secondary school environments to fun-filled designs in primary colors for pre-kindergarten and elementary schools or day-care centers, we’ve got the products that are right for you!

Contact your local FSorb representative today to explore our fine line of sound mitigation solutions and to discuss how our team can support you in designing the best school acoustic treatment strategy.



At FSorb, we are motivated by improving human health and do so by creating eco-friendly acoustic products. Our mission is to help designers build beautiful spaces that reduce excess ambient noise while calming the human nervous system. With over 25 years in the acoustic business we stand behind FSorb as a durable, environmentally friendly, and low-cost product. If you want an acoustic solution that is safe to human health at an affordable price, then we are your resource.

(844) 313-7672



  1. Pirilä S, Jokitulppo J, Niemitalo-Haapola E, Yliherva A, Rantala L. Teachers' and Children's Experiences after an Acoustic Intervention and a Noise-Controlling Workshop in Two Elementary Classrooms. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2020;72(6):454-463. doi: 10.1159/000503231. Epub 2019 Oct 22. PMID: 31639814.

  2. Kristiansen J, Lund SP, Persson R, Challi R, Lindskov JM, Nielsen PM, Larsen PK, Toftum J. The effects of acoustical refurbishment of classrooms on teachers' perceived noise exposure and noise-related health symptoms. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Feb;89(2):341-50. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1077-3. Epub 2015 Aug 11. PMID: 26259727.

  3. Eysel-Gosepath K, Daut T, Pinger A, Lehmacher W, Erren T. Effects of noise in primary schools on health facets in German teachers. Noise Health. 2012 May-Jun;14(58):129-34. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.97258. PMID: 22718111.

  4. Shield BM, Dockrell JE. The effects of environmental and classroom noise on the academic attainments of primary school children. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jan;123(1):133-44. doi: 10.1121/1.2812596. PMID: 18177145.

  5. Gokdogan O, Gokdogan C. Determination of the level of noise in nurseries and pre-schools and the teachers' level of annoyance. Noise Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;18(84):256-259. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.192475. PMID: 27762254; PMCID: PMC5187653.

  6. Gebauer K, Scharf T, Baumann U, Groneberg DA, Bundschuh M. Noise Exposure of Teachers in Nursery Schools-Evaluation of Measures for Noise Reduction When Dropping DUPLO Toy Bricks into Storage Cases by Sound Analyses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jul 4;13(7):677. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13070677. PMID: 27384575; PMCID: PMC4962218.

  7. Hahad, O., Kröller-Schön, S., Daiber, A., & Münzel, T. (2019). The Cardiovascular Effects of Noise. Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 116(14), 245–250.

  8. Correia, A., Peters, J., Levy, J., et al. (2013). Residential exposure to aircraft noise and hospital admissions for cardiovascular disease: multi-airport retrospective study. The BMJ. doi:

  9. Dangerous Decibels: Hospital Noise More Than a Nuisance. (n.d.) Retrieved September 4, 2022 from

  10. Jue, K., Nathan-Roberts, D. (2019). How Noise Affects Patients in Hospitals. SAGE Journals, 63(1), 1510-1514. doi:

  11. Flores LS, Teixeira AR, Rosito LP, Seimetz BM, Dall'Igna C. Pitch and Loudness from Tinnitus in Individuals with Noise-induced Hearing Loss. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jul;20(3):248-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562935. Epub 2015 Aug 24. PMID: 27413408; PMCID: PMC4942292.

  12. Rosing SN, Schmidt JH, Wedderkopp N, Baguley DM. Prevalence of tinnitus and hyperacusis in children and adolescents: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 3;6(6):e010596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010596. PMID: 27259524; PMCID: PMC4893873.

  13. Ehlert K. Perceptions of public primary school teachers regarding noise-induced hearing loss in South Africa. S Afr J Commun Disord. 2017 Mar 28;64(1):e1-e12. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v64i1.185. PMID: 28397520; PMCID: PMC5843150.

  14. Lim J, Kweon K, Kim HW, Cho SW, Park J, Sim CS. Negative impact of noise and noise sensitivity on mental health in childhood. Noise Health. 2018 Sep-Oct;20(96):199-211. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_9_18. PMID: 30516173; PMCID: PMC6301087.

  15. Clark C, Crumpler C, Notley AH. Evidence for Environmental Noise Effects on Health for the United Kingdom Policy Context: A Systematic Review of the Effects of Environmental Noise on Mental Health, Wellbeing, Quality of Life, Cancer, Dementia, Birth, Reproductive Outcomes, and Cognition. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 7;17(2):393. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020393. PMID: 31936110; PMCID: PMC7013411.

  16. Crombie R, Clark C, Stansfeld SA. Environmental noise exposure, early biological risk and mental health in nine to ten year old children: a cross-sectional field study. Environ Health. 2011 May 14;10:39. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-39. PMID: 21569605; PMCID: PMC3117762.

  17. Poor Acoustics Inhibit Human Connection. (2017, July 19). Retrieved September 4, 2022 from

  18. Zijlema WL, de Kluizenaar Y, van Kamp I, Hartman CA. Associations between road traffic noise exposure at home and school and ADHD in school-aged children: the TRAILS study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;30(1):155-167. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01521-8. Epub 2020 Apr 3. PMID: 32246274; PMCID: PMC7864841.

  19. Hjortebjerg D, Andersen AM, Christensen JS, Ketzel M, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Sunyer J, Julvez J, Forns J, Sørensen M. Exposure to Road Traffic Noise and Behavioral Problems in 7-Year-Old Children: A Cohort Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Feb;124(2):228-34. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409430. Epub 2015 Jun 30. PMID: 26126294; PMCID: PMC4749080.

  20. Hjortebjerg D, Andersen AM, Christensen JS, Ketzel M, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Sunyer J, Julvez J, Forns J, Sørensen M. Exposure to Road Traffic Noise and Behavioral Problems in 7-Year-Old Children: A Cohort Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Feb;124(2):228-34. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409430. Epub 2015 Jun 30. PMID: 26126294; PMCID: PMC4749080.

  21. Klatte, M., Bergstrom, K., Lachmann, T. (2013). Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:

  22. Clark C, Sörqvist P. A 3 year update on the influence of noise on performance and behavior. Noise Health. 2012 Nov-Dec;14(61):292-6. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.104896. PMID: 23257580.

  23. Sörqvist P. The role of working memory capacity in auditory distraction: a review. Noise Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;12(49):217-24. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.70500. PMID: 20871176.

  24. Klatte M, Bergström K, Lachmann T. Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 30;4:578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00578. PMID: 24009598; PMCID: PMC3757288.

  25. Hernandez LM, Green SA, Lawrence KE, Inada M, Liu J, Bookheimer SY, Dapretto M. Social Attention in Autism: Neural Sensitivity to Speech Over Background Noise Predicts Encoding of Social Information. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 24;11:343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00343. PMID: 32390890; PMCID: PMC7194032.

  26. Green SA, Hernandez LM, Bowman HC, Bookheimer SY, Dapretto M. Sensory over-responsivity and social cognition in ASD: Effects of aversive sensory stimuli and attentional modulation on neural responses to social cues. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Jan;29:127-139. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 21. PMID: 28284787; PMCID: PMC5990012.

  27. Green SA, Rudie JD, Colich NL, Wood JJ, Shirinyan D, Hernandez L, Tottenham N, Dapretto M, Bookheimer SY. Overreactive brain responses to sensory stimuli in youth with autism spectrum disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;52(11):1158-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Aug 24. PMID: 24157390; PMCID: PMC3820504.

  28. Eysel-Gosepath K, Daut T, Pinger A, Lehmacher W, Erren T. Sound levels and their effects on children in a German primary school. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Dec;269(12):2475-83. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1899-x. Epub 2011 Dec 29. PMID: 22205239.

  29. Eysel-Gosepath K, Pape HG, Erren T, Thinschmidt M, Lehmacher W, Piekarski C. Lärm in Kindertagesstätten [Sound levels in nursery schools]. HNO. 2010 Oct;58(10):1013-20. German. doi: 10.1007/s00106-010-2121-y. PMID: 20480127.


bottom of page